Capital
“Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world” gets quoted so often it’s stopped meaning anything. Here’s the actual math behind it, run with real numbers, so the claim either holds up or it doesn’t.
The actual formula, no hand-waving
Compound interest grows a balance because each period’s interest is calculated on a base that already includes the previous period’s interest — not just the original amount, the way simple interest works.
A is the ending balance, P is what you start with, r is the annual rate as a decimal, n is how many times per year it compounds, and t is the number of years.
Starting at 25 vs. starting at 35
Same monthly contribution, same assumed 7% average annual return, only the start date changes:
| Starts investing at | Monthly | Years contributing | Balance at 65 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age 25 | $300 | 40 | ≈ $719,000 |
| Age 35 | $300 | 30 | ≈ $340,000 |
Illustrative example only — assumes a flat 7% annual return compounded monthly, which real markets never deliver in a straight line. Not a projection or a guarantee.
Ten years of head start roughly doubles the ending balance here, despite the 35-year-old contributing for 75% as many years, not a small amount less. That gap is what people mean by “time in the market matters more than timing the market” — it’s not a slogan, it’s what the exponent in the formula does.
Why compounding frequency barely matters
Marketing copy loves “daily compounding” as if it’s meaningfully better than monthly or annual. At realistic rates, the difference between daily and annual compounding on a 7% return over 30 years is a rounding error compared to the difference between starting in your 20s versus your 30s. Frequency is a minor lever. Time and contribution size are the two that actually move the number.
Common questions
Run Your Life on Your Own Terms
The Keep — coffee, liberty, and capital, one email a week. No fluff, no spin.